BENITIONSClinical Trial Intelligence

FIRE AND ICE: Comparative Study of Two Ablation Procedures in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

N/A Completed NCT01490814

ConditionSymptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
PhaseN/A
SponsorMedtronic Cardiac Ablation Solutions
StatusCompleted
Enrollment769 participants
InterventionsElectrical isolation of the pulmonary veins, Electrical isolation of pulmonary veins
Start dateDec, 2011
Completion dateJan, 2016
Results postedNov 2, 2018

Summary

Comparing efficacy and safety of isolation of the pulmonary veins (PV) using a Cryoballoon catheter versus a radiofrequency ablation with a ThermoCool catheter in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Number of Subjects With Recurrence of Atrial Arrhythmias or Prescription of Anti-arrhythmic Drug or Re-ablation After a Blanking Period of Three Months After the Initial Ablation Procedure

33 months · Participants

Cryoballoon Ablation138 Participants
Radiofrequency Ablation143 Participants

Number of Subjects With a Primary Safety Event. A Primary Safety Event Includes a Composite of Death (Including Cardiovascular Death), All-cause Stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) and Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest.

33 months · Participants

Cryoballoon Ablation334 Participants
Radiofrequency Ablation325 Participants
Cryoballoon Ablation2 Participants
Radiofrequency Ablation0 Participants
Cryoballoon Ablation2 Participants
Radiofrequency Ablation2 Participants

Open in BENITIONS View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Other trials for this condition

All trials

This page summarises publicly available data from ClinicalTrials.gov. It is not medical advice and not investment advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.