FIRE AND ICE: Comparative Study of Two Ablation Procedures in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
N/A
Completed
NCT01490814
| Condition | Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation |
|---|
| Phase | N/A |
|---|
| Sponsor | Medtronic Cardiac Ablation Solutions |
|---|
| Status | Completed |
|---|
| Enrollment | 769 participants |
|---|
| Interventions | Electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins, Electrical isolation of pulmonary veins |
|---|
| Start date | Dec, 2011 |
|---|
| Completion date | Jan, 2016 |
|---|
| Results posted | Nov 2, 2018 |
|---|
Summary
Comparing efficacy and safety of isolation of the pulmonary veins (PV) using a Cryoballoon catheter versus a radiofrequency ablation with a ThermoCool catheter in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Number of Subjects With Recurrence of Atrial Arrhythmias or Prescription of Anti-arrhythmic Drug or Re-ablation After a Blanking Period of Three Months After the Initial Ablation Procedure
33 months · Participants
| Cryoballoon Ablation | 138 Participants |
|---|
| Radiofrequency Ablation | 143 Participants |
|---|
Number of Subjects With a Primary Safety Event. A Primary Safety Event Includes a Composite of Death (Including Cardiovascular Death), All-cause Stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) and Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest.
33 months · Participants
| Cryoballoon Ablation | 334 Participants |
|---|
| Radiofrequency Ablation | 325 Participants |
|---|
| Cryoballoon Ablation | 2 Participants |
|---|
| Radiofrequency Ablation | 0 Participants |
|---|
| Cryoballoon Ablation | 2 Participants |
|---|
| Radiofrequency Ablation | 2 Participants |
|---|
Open in BENITIONS
View on ClinicalTrials.gov
Other trials for this condition
All trials
This page summarises publicly available data from ClinicalTrials.gov. It is not medical advice and not investment advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.