BENITIONSClinical Trial Intelligence

FIRE AND ICE: Comparative Study of Two Ablation Procedures in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Не применимо Завершено NCT01490814

ЗаболеваниеSymptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
ФазаНе применимо
СпонсорMedtronic Cardiac Ablation Solutions
СтатусЗавершено
Участники769 участн.
ВмешательствоElectrical isolation of the pulmonary veins, Electrical isolation of pulmonary veins
Дата начала12.2011
Дата завершения01.2016
Публикация результатов2.11.2018

Кратко

Comparing efficacy and safety of isolation of the pulmonary veins (PV) using a Cryoballoon catheter versus a radiofrequency ablation with a ThermoCool catheter in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Number of Subjects With Recurrence of Atrial Arrhythmias or Prescription of Anti-arrhythmic Drug or Re-ablation After a Blanking Period of Three Months After the Initial Ablation Procedure

33 months · Participants

Cryoballoon Ablation138 Participants
Radiofrequency Ablation143 Participants

Number of Subjects With a Primary Safety Event. A Primary Safety Event Includes a Composite of Death (Including Cardiovascular Death), All-cause Stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) and Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest.

33 months · Participants

Cryoballoon Ablation334 Participants
Radiofrequency Ablation325 Participants
Cryoballoon Ablation2 Participants
Radiofrequency Ablation0 Participants
Cryoballoon Ablation2 Participants
Radiofrequency Ablation2 Participants

Открыть в BENITIONS Открыть на ClinicalTrials.gov

Другие исследования по этому заболеванию

Все исследования

Страница обобщает открытые данные ClinicalTrials.gov. Это не медицинская и не инвестиционная рекомендация. Обратитесь к врачу.