BENITIONSClinical Trial Intelligence

Comparison of PolarX and the Arctic Front Cryoballoons for PVI in Patients With Symptomatic Paroxysmal AF

4상 완료 NCT04704986

대상 질환Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
임상 단계4상
스폰서Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
상태완료
참여자 수202 명
중재(약물)PVI using the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic), PVI using the PolarX Cryoballoon (Boston Scientific)
시작일2021년 3월 29일
완료일2023년 7월 31일
결과 공개일2026년 7월 24일

요약

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Single shot devices are increasingly used for PVI. Currently, Medtronic Arctic Front cryoballoon is the most frequently used single shot technology and hence is the benchmark for upcoming technologies. A novel cryoballoon technology has recently been introduced (PolarX, Boston Scientific). However, whether PolarX provides effectiveness similar to the standard-of-practice Medtronic Arctic Front cryoballoon is yet to be investigated. Given that PolarX was developed considering the reported limitations and potential failures associated with the Medtronic Arctic Front cryoballoon, it might be even more effective and safe for use in AF ablation procedures. The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of the PolarX Cryoballoon (Boston Scientific) and the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic) in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI. This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label trial with blinded endpoint adjudication. Given that the Medtronic Arctic Front Cryoballoon is the standard-of-practice for single shot PVI and the P

Number of Patients With Recurrence of Any Atrial Tachyarrhythmia

days 91 to 365 post-ablation · Participants

PVI Using the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic)48 Participants
PVI Using the PolarX Cryoballoon (Boston Scientific)41 Participants

BENITIONS에서 보기 ClinicalTrials.gov 원문 보기

같은 질환의 다른 임상

전체 임상

이 페이지는 ClinicalTrials.gov의 공개 데이터를 정리한 것입니다. 의학적 조언이 아니며 투자 권유나 자문도 아닙니다. 반드시 전문의와 상담하세요.